A version of this article was first published on Oct. 9, 2023.

Today, Oct. 14, is Indigenous Peoples’ Day in the United States. Last year, we presented a selection of recent Just Security articles analyzing Indigenous issues at the intersection of law, policy, climate, justice, and more; because these articles all remain so timely, we are re-featuring the collection in connection with the holiday today, with the addition of several more articles published in the past year.

Also new this year: the list ends with a collection of recently released media — a symposium, a documentary film, a set of podcast, and a book — from beyond our pages, that may further illuminate some of the issues we cover.

Climate and Indigenous Issues

Climate change disproportionately impacts Tribal Nations in the United States and Indigenous communities worldwide, and Indigenous activists have been at the forefront of worldwide climate leadership — even as their efforts face repression. As climate litigation grew in 2024, Indigenous communities played a key role, both at the State level — as small islands States in the South Pacific led litigation — and pushing for action within countries.

We encourage readers to peruse the full climate archive and writing on Indigenous peoples’ issues. Some examples of recent coverage include:

Series on Native Sovereignty in U.S Supreme Court Cases

Today, on Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Indigenous people grapple with colonialism, history, and trauma. A future that truly honors Indigenous people and Tribal Nations must be rooted in sovereignty and begin from a place of self-determination – including jurisdiction over a sovereign Tribe’s own members. Tribal sovereignty has a storied history with a complex legal relationship with the United States. Contemporaneous indigeneity allows Indigenous people and allies to see that history while simultaneously recognizing and celebrating the exercise of tribal sovereignty. The intersection of the past and present provide education, resilience, and hope.

The assimilationist project failed once before. But in Denezpi and other cases challenging Native sovereignty, modern-day proponents seek to revive it under the guise of concerns over individual rights. This particular case is framed around double jeopardy, but that should not be allowed to obscure its deeper purpose: as part of a long line of efforts to chip away at the sovereignty of Native nations.

A nation’s sovereignty and security are inherently bound up with the right to control its territory. There are few greater threats to national security than the arbitrary loss of territory – and there are few sovereigns whose national security is more precarious than Native nations, sovereigns within a sovereign that have seen their rights eroded time and again.

Intersectional Writing on Justice and National Security

Professor Aziz Rana, in National Security Law and the Originalist Myth – published in connection with the Oxford University Press/Just Security volume Race and National Security (Professor Matiangai V. S. Sirleaf, ed.) – writes:

Ultimately, any genuine project of national security reform requires more than reviving a fictive eighteenth century of checks and balances. It instead entails treating foreign interventionism as only one expression of a broader colonial imagination and infrastructure, present since the framing and never adequately uprooted. Alongside challenging the state’s international police power, such a reformist approach includes ending the colonial status of all the existing territorial dependencies – in line with the genuine political desires of local and self-determining communities. It also revolves around everything from sharing sovereignty with Native peoples and land return to reparations, decriminalizing the border, transformative and structural reforms to intelligence and policing apparatuses, and providing judicial avenues for the remedy of past colonial crimes as well as contemporary national security ones.

A growing number of our authors explore national security through a lens that grapples with the consequences of settler-colonialism, past and present, in the United States and elsewhere. While these themes cut through various Just Security articles, recommended starting points include:

Beyond Our Pages

Finally, for your holiday reading, listening, and watching, readers may be interested in the following recent releases:

  • Symposium on Johnson v. M’Intosh in the Tribal Law Journal, University of New Mexico – School of Law (Aug. 2024). Leading academics examine the legacy of a 1823 Supreme Court case that has shaped and continues to shape U.S. law as it relates to Tribal Nations. The symposium ends with a keynote lecture from Interior Secretary Deb Haaland.
  • By the Fire We Carry by Rebecca Nagle. The host of This Land podcast has a new book, released in September, subtitled “The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land.” It may be of particular interest to readers looking for more on the themes of sovereignty discussed in our series above.
  • Bad River (film), now streaming and at screenings through December, explores issues at the intersection of sovereignty and environmental justice, through the experiences of the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa.
  • Undammed: The Klamath River Story (podcast: Spotify, Apple), airing now with new episodes weekly, offers an example of Indigenous climate leadership. It covers the “largest dam removal in history,” the result of decades of Tribal-led advocacy that centered on the importance of salmon and steelhead to Native culture and to the economy of the Klamath River basin region, on the Oregon-California border. After more than a century away, salmon were documented swimming freely in the river earlier this month, just days after the dam removal was completed.
IMAGE via Getty Images.