Wednesday marks one week since Robert Mueller broke his silence and made a formal statement on the special counsel’s report on the 2016 Russian election interference.

The Chart below compares Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s May 29 public statement with statements made by Attorney General William Barr.

Whether or not Mueller was intentionally trying to correct the record, the differences between what he and Barr said are, in many cases, stark. Some of the differences involve near complete contradictions—in other words Mueller’s statement and Barr’s statements cannot both be true. Other differences are more a matter of emphasis or tone (e.g., references to the threat posed by the Russian operations, descriptions of the qualities of the special counsel staff).

The special counsel’s Report also contradicts some of Barr’s statements (such as his claim that the Report found no evidence of “collusion,” his suggestion that difficult issues of law and fact stopped the special counsel from concluding the president engaged in criminal obstruction, his claim that the President cooperate fully with the investigation). The following analysis, however, does not include the Report. Instead, it focuses only on Mueller’s public statement and how it compares to statements made by Barr between March 22 (the date that the special counsel handed his final report to the attorney general) and May 29 (the date of Mueller’s statement). This includes statements made by Barr in his 4-page summary submitted to Congress, a formal press briefing, and three congressional hearings, but it does not include Barr’s interviews with Fox News and the Wall Street Journal.

Chart: A Side-by-Side Comparison of Barr’s vs. Mueller’s Statements About Special Counsel Report on 2016 Ru… by Just Security on Scribd

Images: left – Win McNamee/Getty; right – Chip Somodevilla/Getty

 

About the Author(s)

Send A Letter To The Editor

Read these related stories next:

No Claim to Fame: Kash Patel and False or Misleading Statements About the 2016 Russia Investigation

by

Jan 29th, 2025

Expert Q&A on South Korea: Martial Law and Its Aftermath

by

Dec 5th, 2024

After Immunity: How Judge Chutkan Should Apply Trump v. U.S.—and When

by , , and

Sep 2nd, 2024

The Limited Effects of Fischer: DOJ Data Reveals Supreme Court’s Narrowing of Jan. 6th Obstruction Charges Will Have Minimal Impact

by , and

Jun 28th, 2024

Keeping Count: Major Adverse Legal Findings Against Donald Trump (Nov. 2020-2024)

by and

May 2nd, 2024

Why and How the Senate Should Swiftly Dismiss the Impeachment Charges Against Mayorkas

by , , and

Feb 14th, 2024

Constitutional Law Scholars on the Impeachment Proceedings Against Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas

by and

Jan 10th, 2024

The Biden Impeachment Inquiry: A Heedless Descent into Constitutional Anarchy

by

Dec 13th, 2023

Comparing the Trump Indictment and the January 6th Select Committee’s Final Report

by

Aug 3rd, 2023

The Trump Indictment: What Top Intelligence Experts Are Saying

by

Jun 14th, 2023

How Much Prison Time Does Former President Trump Face? Applying the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

by

Jun 12th, 2023

Republicans Are Calling to Impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Here’s Why Their Case is Bunk

by

Mar 13th, 2023