Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on November 9, 2017. Issa announced this week that he would not seek re-election. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Just Security‘s editorial board members had a number of things to say on Twitter about national security this week, tapping out threads on everything from the Mueller investigation to legislation that may enable warrantless surveillance on Americans, to hyper-partisanship seeping into national security matters. To make things easier for you, we’ve gathered a collection of the top tweet of select threads by our authors below. Click on the tweet to access the entire thread.
Mueller Investigation Interviewing Trump
On Jan. 8, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti analyzed news reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had spoken to President Donald Trump’s legal team about interviewing him in the Russia investigation. Mariotti noted that Trump’s legal team will try to limit any such interview as to topic or setting, though he believes the Mueller investigation would be unlikely to accept a written question and answer exchange.
THREAD: Will Mueller interview Trump? What will that interview look like? (Short answer: Expect live, not written, questions and answers.)
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) January 8, 2018
1/ This morning @NBCNews repotted that Trump’s legal team is preparing for Mueller to ask Trump for an interview and has come up with a number of requests that they’ll make of Mueller. https://t.co/G3kDRFkF9L
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) January 8, 2018
Rep. Darrell Issa’s Retirement
Upon hearing the Jan. 8 news that Republican Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) will be retiring, Andy Wright recounted his personal experiences as a congressional staffer enduring the incredibly unproductive hyperpartisanship that Issa introduced to the House Oversight Committee. Make sure you read through to the parts about Issa measuring the drapes in Wright’s offices:
THREAD on Darrell Issa’s retirement, based on my experiences with him as a committee staffer in Congress & an Obama White House lawyer.
There will be grave dancing. 1/ https://t.co/qRoJxBO6p8— Andy Wright (@AndyMcCanse) January 10, 2018
FISA Section 702 Reform, Related Litigation, and the Fourth Amendment
Just Security‘s editorial board members had plenty to say about surveillance this week. Former FBI special agent Asha Rangappa and surveillance reform expert Jennifer Granick both analyzed the House’s move to reauthorize the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, including the Section 702. Meanwhile, Steve Vladeck commented on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s certification of a standing question to the FISA Court of Review. And Julian Sanchez discussed the Fourth Amendment and the role class plays when it comes to government surveillance.
ARTICLE THREAD. Confused about what is going on with FISA after this morning’s crazy grandpa tweets? These three pieces can help you sort it out:
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 11, 2018
Yes. And btw, guess who would love more than anything to create chaos and confusion about Section 702 and have it tank? Russian intelligence, who have more shenanigans coming our way. https://t.co/SlTWhuTQkA
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 12, 2018
Thanks to @EPICprivacy for its FOIA that revealed this document detailing an example of FBI agent searching section 702 data for information about a US person. https://t.co/fsAxufU9Qf
— Jennifer Granick (@granick) January 10, 2018
Another #FISA first: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has certified a question re: the @ACLU’s standing to seek disclosures of opinions (on which the en banc court divided 6-5 last month) to the FISA Court of Review:https://t.co/IHkWP22mNy
(H/T: @meganmcgraham.)
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 8, 2018
I wrote a short post about this ages ago, but there’s definitely an undercurrent of class consciousness in Founding Era arguments for the Fourth Amendment. Who’s doing the searches & who’s searched matters. https://t.co/qhxc65Ya1E
— Julian Sanchez (@normative) January 10, 2018
Congressional Republicans’ Calls to Investigate Fusion GPS
Finally, Asha Rangappa and Julian Sanchez commented on Fusion GPS and the Steele Dossier and their role, or lack thereof, in the FBI’s investigation into Russian election meddling in light of Republican efforts to discredit Fusion GPS, the dossier, and the FBI’s investigation.
THREAD. This is an important read by Fusion GPS about the genesis of the so-called Steele dossier and its role in the FBI investigation. A few subtle points that may be missed: https://t.co/N9MoTpgNGW
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 3, 2018
Just to underscore: The Five Eyes (Canada, U.K., Australia, and New Zealand, in addition to us) are our CLOSEST intelligence partners. BOTH Australia and a former intelligence officer in the U.K. provided intel to the U.S. that they believed were a nat’l security risk. https://t.co/K7ZLzFehcn
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 10, 2018
So after trying to prevent release of this transcript and referring a bogus criminal complaint to the FBI, you now what the “whole story” to come out, @LindseyGrahamSC? You could start by retracting your false assertion that Steele was acting as an “FBI informant,” bc he was not. https://t.co/Yk7cB3R47O
— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) January 10, 2018
So the dossier again. First, there’s a fair point here that even if the FBI inquiry started because of a tip about Papadopolous, that’s clearly not the proximate basis for getting a FISA on anyone, let alone Carter Page. https://t.co/R8phmgyHq4
— Julian Sanchez (@normative) January 5, 2018