Editor’s note: In light of development at the NATO 2026 summit in Ankara, we are providing these essays as a collection.
Greenland has recently become the subject of significant interest by the Trump administration. In 2026, the United States has threatened the use of military force to seize the territory, over which NATO member Denmark has long had sovereignty.
In this collection, experts examine the legal, political, and security dimensions of U.S. policy towards Greenland, including with respect to U.S.-NATO relations, congressional oversight, and broader geopolitical implications.
- Michael Carpenter, The Transatlantic Dilemma: How to Pursue Autonomy Without Foreclosing Future Cooperation (May 15, 2026)
- Michael Schiffer, The Trump Administration Is Sabotaging Its Own Arctic Strategy (April 1, 2026)
- Neil Weare and Adi Martínez Román, How Greenland’s Relationship with Denmark Exposes the Shortcomings of Being a “U.S. Territory” (Feb. 3, 2026)
- Alberto J. Mora, Greenland Post-Davos: Enforcing 22 USC 1928f to Save NATO and Contain Trump’s Lawless Foreign Policy (Feb. 2, 2026)
- Michael Schmitt and Tess Bridgeman, The Insurmountable Legal Obstacles to U.S. Acquisition of Greenland (Jan. 22, 2026)
- Daniel Maurer, Steven J. Lepper, Eugene R. Fidell and Alberto J. Mora, and Frank Rosenblatt, Hypothetical Legal Review of Use of the U.S. Military in Greenland (Jan. 22, 2026)
- Alberto J. Mora, How Congress Can Preserve NATO: Using 22 USC 1928f to Protect the Peace in Greenland (Jan. 16, 2026)
- Frank A. Rose, Trump Is Right About Greenland — Wrong About How to Secure It (Jan. 13, 2026)
- Michael Schmitt, The North Atlantic Treaty and a U.S. Attack on Denmark (Jan. 13, 2026)
- Ambassador Daniel Fried, Trump’s New Year Foreign Policy: The Risk that the Bold and the Bad Outweigh the Constructive (Jan. 8, 2026)
- Kal Raustiala, More Territory, More Problems: Can Trump Seize Greenland? (Feb. 19, 2025)






